aLegendWai (Contest Sponsor & Organizer): Good news! There are a lot of submissions relating to the contest of "Unbelievable! The super-smallest group that lives!)". The final result is released, arranging from the lowest to highest ranking. Although this contest is of little (not to say no) help with your Go skills, it is surely interesting to read. :P Enjoy!!
|Table of contents||Table of diagrams
Black seems alive here with a threat
rest white too
rest white too
rest white too
Zero stones. ;)
If black plays first
Black is alive.
Fifth corner group
Sixth corner group
Seventh corner group
Fifth side group
Alive by Superko
Black can't kill or reduce to seki?
Another living group in the corner... made with 5 stones... - but can be forced to add another one if W plays at a . . .
Robert Pauli: Minimal eyes would rule out this case too.
RobAnybody: 4 stones with two eyes, a and b :)
Robert Pauli: That's three eyes, Rob - one almost filled. :--)
Under (unofficial) "can't escape = dead" rules the white stones in the almost filled eye are dead, that's the problem. On the other hand, Black neither can convert his group to two minimal eyes (including the big eye!). So, it seems more appropriate to regard the whole thing as seki. This suggest to define "having two eyes" as being able to form two minimal eyes . . .
Dolgan: this is not a seki, because black could just capture all white stones and live. But the diagram doesn't qualifiy as "Two eyes"...
???: Currently all entries are for a "big" rectangular board. Taking a smaller one cuts the number of stones needed. The minimum is one stone in the center of a 3x1.
Robert Pauli: Hmm, thought I made it clear (BTW, thanks for watching me, Bill ;--), but what about
Does the black group have "two eyes" ? :--))
LCZLAPINSKI: No, since the 2nd liberty is not surrounded by one color. At game end under Japanese rules, white might argue that the white group is alive since after black plays white can place a living stone.
RP: Right :-)
sIG: Well we're talking about black shapes here, there it is white who has the suicide "shape".
Should we restrict eyes to be minimal at the top ?
Bill: That's an interesting rules question, Robert. ;-) By J89 and my rules, no. How about by yours?
But the question remains, "minimal eyes" ?
Warfreak2: If you give White one one-space eye, then it is a proper seki.
???: Seems like two eyes. And the situation is exactly the same as in "normal" two-eyed groups: white can't play any legal moves, while black could play but decides not to. So I wouldn't agree to a seki here.
LCZLAPINSKI: Under Japanese rule 8 there is only one eye. So under Japanese rules, it is a seki. "Article 8. Territory Empty points surrounded by the live stones of just one player are called "eye points." Other empty points are called "dame." "
unkx80: This is my tongue-in-cheek answer. =P
aLegendWai: unkx80, you are awarded the ultimate crown of God of Go?.
The prize of this award is you can define what God of Go? is, including its Go power and skills. I know the prize is not really fantastic, but I don't get commercial sponsors for some material prizes.
Bisqwit: Zero stones, seki. First player to play loses.
Bisqwit: If black plays first, white captures.
Anonymous: Black has -1 stones, because the opposite of black is white.
Below are some small live groups that must be defended against attack to stay alive.
Robert Pauli: Parked'em here. To be deleted in, say, 2005.
aLegendWai: Your discussion is interesting. Instead of deleting it, I parked them at discussion sub-page. Happy with it?
6 stones, 6 different eye shapes, 7 different stone shapes
--Xingta: Shouldn't the last three examples really be 7 stone shapes even if they are alive with 6. The last example has a false eye too - how does that work?
8 Stones but 4 different eye spaces.
Anonymous: Does this really count as an 8 stone group? White has a ko threat at "a" inside the group that he will play eventually, making this a 9 stone group for black. Ian: My guess is that there is no point in playing a stone inside this group. Black will respond by connecting and have 2 eyes.
Ellbur: I don't think that groups which can be threatened to add a stone or stones should be included in Smallest Group With Two Eyes, as this could be extended to include a one stone living group: one lone stone on the 3-3 point.
Alex Weldon: Well, it's ambiguous, because the page title says "smallest group with two eyes," but some of these groups have one large eye (big enough to make two eyes) and some have two eyes, but (at least) one of the eyes has a ko threat against it, so the group is not unconditionally alive. Maybe a better title would be "smallest pass-alive group" (unconditional life is also ambiguous, because it's sometimes used to mean life without ko in a life & death problem, regardless of whether ko threats remain). Either way, a single stone on the 3-3 point would not appear here, because all of these groups are completely surrounded by the opponent. Clearly, a stone on the 3-3 point is not alive under those conditions.
White is alive by superko (but has no eyes?) Here's a little python script to generate such a position. Great for testing the limits of your favorite sgf file reader:
from sys import stdout from string import letters
size = 9
black, white = "B", "W"
positions = [letters[x] + letters[y] for x in range(size) for y in range(size)] center = letters[size / 2] * 2 positions.remove(center) positions.extend([center, ""])
lp = len(positions) endpos, mcenter, mpass = lp - 3, lp - 2, lp - 1
def move(color, pos): stdout.write(";%s[%s]" % (color, positions[pos]))
stdout.write("(;GMFFSTRU[Chinese]SZ[%d]\n" % size) for x in range(endpos): # for each position except the last move(black, x) move(white, mcenter) move(black, x + 1)
# fill with white for y in range(x + 2, endpos + 1) + range(x): move(white, y) move(black, mpass) move(white, x)
# do the last move(black, endpos) move(white, mcenter)
# fill with black move(black, 0) for x in range(1, endpos): move(white, mpass) move(black, x) move(white, mcenter) stdout.write(")\n")
All of the 0 stones are alive. Or can black kill all virtual groups with tengen? ~srn347