DieterVerhofstadt's personal comments:
In a discussion on rec.games.go (November 2001) on "studying games of Go Seigen" someone noted that his teacher (a pro) encouraged him (and every amateur) to study games of professional players who play natural moves, such as Takemiya Masaki and Otake Hideo. He considered Go Seigen much too complex for us amateurs to understand and appreciate.
I followed the advice and quit studying Wu's games. I started to go through the Otake collection instead. I replay them through my sgf-viewer with the goban next to the computer. It seems to be important to feel the physical effect of a pro move. Before each move, I try to guess where it will be and put the stone on the goban. Then I adjust. When I don't have to adjust, a great feeling of satisfaction betakes me. It is certainly true that the "success rate" with Otake is much higher than with Wu. I don't read any comments, but write down a couple of moves per game that I really didn't expect.
HolIgor: I noticed an interesting aspect of the reviewing professional games. If you play after it you subconciously try to follow the pattern. After viewing Takemiya's game I played for a moyo in the center, then exchanged it for the territory and after viewing the last Oza game I got all four corners. If Cho does it then why can't I do it?
I think that if you have time, which does not happen often, the best thing is a live broadcast. You can sit at the computer and think with them. You have some ideas, other kibitzers that are stronger than you show you things that you don't see. I watched some game recently and I have to say that the moves they make are simple and natural mostly. Of course, in the last Oza match Cho Chikun went for a big adventure in the end and won a magnificent semeai. I don't know if all that was read out or he just risked in a hope that he'd get enough liberties to kill the opponent's stones. He needed nine. It was fascinating that he got them.
Gomic55's pro game study method
It's quite hard to memorize an entire professional game unless you have some special talent for the game. Still, with some practice and the proper tools I've managed to find a way to memorize a game every week. Here is how I go about it.
Tools :
Method :
Comments :
Which games to study :
I see this question alot. I think you should study famous games first. They will be easier to learn because of their special meaning.
xela: How do you go about choosing exactly which games to study? For example, suppose I decide to take the advice above and look at some Otake Hideo games. The gobase site gives 1000 games to choose from. Are they all equally worth studying?
Velobici: What is considered correct or best play changes over time (hopefully for the better). For this reason, looking at his most recent games may be best. That said, looking at his games from title wins may be better yet, as those games show lines of play that won in the contest with other professionals of the highest ability.
Bob McGuigan: I agree that title match games are more likely to be important than others. However, even games where a big mistake was made, resulting in an early resignation, can be instructive. There are commented games available, too, in Go World magazine and Tournament Go 1992. One approach to studying pro games is to identify a style you like, for example Takemiya's "Cosmic Style", or Otake's use of thickness, find opponents with identifiable styles (like Cho Chikun's territory-oriented style) and see how your favorite player handles that kind of style.
About the nifty feature on Gobase.org: MultiGo also has such a mode (so-called tutor mode), in which you must click on the right spot to proceed to the next move; it is possible to choose between one- and two-sided tutor mode. A great way to train memory?