Taiwan/ Discussion

Sub-page of Taiwan

MalwethPDA: Although somewhat independently ruled, it IS a part of China. In international goe competitions I've seen it refered to as "Chinese Taipei," as in the Olympics.

The question is: what is an appropriate PC description of Taiwan?

I will be removing "independently ruled" from the description, leaving it as simply an island off the coast of China.

Bildstein: For these issues, it's often a good idea to look at Wikipedia, a site that prides itself on its neutral point of view and hence political correctness. From [ext] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan:

This article is on the people, history, culture, and geography of Taiwan.
For the state commonly known as "Taiwan," see [ext] Republic of China.

So perhaps we should also ask ourselves whether we're talking about the island or the nation/state/government. I don't know the answer to that question.

Malweth: We're certainly talking about Taiwan the people, island, and country. It's hard to separate the people from the country. The problem with being Politically Correct about Taiwan in a global setting is that, according to the USA, China, and many other countries, Taiwan is a republic of China. To a fewer other countries (Isreal and others), and a fair number of the population on the island, Taiwan is an independent country.

It seems to me that the best way to discuss Taiwan is to remove all status concerning the political state of the island. Unless specifically required in discussion (such as Visa concerns), Taiwan is neither a country nor a republic on SL.

(Interestingly, Wikipedia calls Taiwan "Republic of China" which is its official designation, but not universally acknowledged).

Bildstein: Wow, this is more interesting than I realised. It turns out the current government of Taiwan is actually just the exiled original government of mainland China (hence they call themselves the "Republic of China"), and the current government of mainland China ("Peoples Republic of China") is from an uprising earlier this century. What I find really interesting is that the new China government actually managed to get the old China government kicked out of the UN, taking its seat in even the security council: [ext] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_and_the_United_Nations.

Rafael: "somewhat independently ruled"? Taiwan has been de facto independent for more than 50 years now. They have independent judiciary, legislative and executive powers, their own currency and military (if anything they're dependent on US military, but so is Japan and many other countries). Taiwan being called "Chinese Taipei" in go and sports competitions is due to Beijing (PRC) pressure. This is well-known.

To PRC, Taiwan is a province of China, and thus PRC is sovereign over it. This is clearly not the position of USA. Taiwan has de facto embassies in many countries, including USA.

It's silly to say that on SL Taiwan can't be called a country or republic. The ROC also used to claim sovereignty over all of China (don't know what's the situation now), but that doesn't change the fact that PRC have been ruling mainland China and doesn't stop people calling China a republic.

"what is an appropriate PC description of Taiwan?" I'm not sure if we need a description of Taiwan on SL at all, but we certainly don't need a PC one. It's not like China will bomb the SL server if we say that Taiwan is a country.

Velobici: Taiwan (ROC) is either independently ruled or its government is subservient to another. Clearly, if Taiwan was subservient to the People's Republic of China (PRC), ROC would have disbanded or its leader would be an appointee of PRC ala Hong Kong (elected from a PRC approved list of candidates). It is ROC's independence and PRC's rejection of that independence that creates the current friction between the two governments.

Perhaps it would be best to delete the country pages (Japan, China, Taiwan, etc.). They add little to Sensei's Library and seem to be a source of dissent.

Bildstein: Definitely not! How can you suggest that because something is contentious it should not be talked about?

Velobici: The fact that there is a contentious issue between two go playing countries has little, if not nothing, to do with go or Sensei's Library. Why should we burden ourselves with the matter. Why should we adopt a position. Wikipedia can take a position...indeed that is a major flaw in Wikipedia...frequently on contenious issues it select a point of view and declares that to be a neutral point of view.

In the dialog above we have people arguing about

  1. independently ruled
  2. appropriateness of Politically Correctness

To what end? How does this improve Sensei's Library?

Let us shun dissention, rather let us learn go together.

Bildstein: Because SL is not only about the game of go, it's about culture as well, and a lot of other things. There are 306 pages labelled as Culture and History - it would seem that each of these warrent deletion about as much as pages like Taiwan. In my opinion, the political differences between Taiwan and China are relevant. They have an effect on professional bodies, on the promotion of go in these countries, and on entry to tournaments. I see these reasons as enough to justify, if not warrent, a discussion on what the real political status of Taiwan is.

Velobici: Sigh. No, lets not delete all the pages in Culture and History. Culture and History pages include particular go games (Atomic bomb game, Blood Vomiting Game), joseki, go equipment information, tournament informatino (Castle Games), various players (Doteki), et cetera.

Please inform us how the political differences between Taiwan and China affect your selected items: professional bodies, on the promotion of go in these countries, and on entry to tournaments.

Bildstein: Okay, I'll humour you. One effect on professional bodies is that there is a Taiwanese professional body as well as a Chinese one. I doubt that if China had managed to gain control of Taiwan this would have happened.

The basis of my comment on entry to tournaments is even more obvious. If Taiwan and China were mutually recognised independant states, there would be no way for a Taiwanese professional to enter a Chinese tournament; Similarly, if Taiwan was under the rule of China and neither recognised a distinction between Taiwan and China, Taiwanese professionals would certainly be able to enter Chinese tournaments, as would any other Chinese citizens.

My third comment, on the promotion of go, is harder to find evidence for, and I must say I'm no expert. Yet I would be very surprised if China is currently supporting, promoting and recognising the Taiwanese professionals as it would if Taiwan was a completely subservient province of China.

Lastly, let me clarify: I am not advocating deleting any of the Culture and History pages any more than I am advocating deleting Taiwan, I was simply (although perhaps not very effectively) trying to make the point that Sensei's Library is about more than just the "learning go together" that you suggested above.

MalwethPDA: I agree with Bildstein. Why delete meaningful conversation about two go playing countries? It isn't as if Middle Eastern politics is being discussed.

Additionally, I don't think many have issues with describing Taiwan as either a non-independent state nor an independent country. It's one of the few places that can handle both distinctions.

I'll take the easy one: when entering international tournaments of any type, the Taiwanese must register as "Chinese Taipei."

Taiwan/ Discussion last edited by Phelan on January 4, 2007 - 08:52
RecentChanges · StartingPoints · About
Edit page ·Search · Related · Page info · Latest diff
[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
Search position
Page history
Latest page diff
Partner sites:
Go Teaching Ladder
Login / Prefs
Sensei's Library