Forum for Two-eye-formation

((no subject)) [#1610]

Back to forum     Back to page

New reply

 
reply
Dieter: ((no subject)) (2008-11-03 11:22) [#5233]

Attempts to get at such formal definitions have been made at formal definitions of eye. Let's link from there or merge these pages.

Secondly, this formal definition includes "adjacent", "string", "stones of a player". I think these should be formalized as well and linked to. Dieter

X
RobertJasiek: Re: ((no subject)) (2008-11-03 13:57) [#5236]

"eye" and "two-eye-formation" are two different concepts. Therefore merging the pages would be very inappropriate.

An eye can be larger than an empy intersection of a two-eye-formation, an eye can contain dead opposing stones, and then there are also eyes in sekis and anti-sekis.

reply
xela: ((no subject)) (2008-11-04 00:12) [#5240]

I think the independent existence of this page makes it easier to read pages such as force, therefore I would be opposed to the idea of merging.

 
Back to forum     Back to page

New reply


Forum for Two-eye-formation
RecentChanges · StartingPoints · About
Edit page ·Search · Related · Page info · Latest diff
[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
RecentChanges
StartingPoints
About
RandomPage
Search position
Page history
Latest page diff
Partner sites:
Go Teaching Ladder
Goproblems.com
Login / Prefs
Tools
Sensei's Library