Nominating for deletion [#4987]
New reply
bugcat:
Nominating for deletion
(2018-02-26 13:28) [#11089]
There's nothing in this article that isn't covered in the one-line entry it gets in the Go variants page. I suggest we delete it, unless there is some forthcoming relevant content like tsumego, games, or real-play positions that would be too cumbersome to add to the variants list.
PJTraill:
Re: Nominating for deletion
(2018-02-28 15:25) [#11090]
Not quite fair, as your own observations are already of some interest, though I am not sure how notable the variant is. But it is a rather half-baked article (rather like this response of mine).
New reply