Living with false eyes [#4242]
126.96.36.199: Living with false eyes
(2017-09-06 16:16) [#11004]
188.8.131.52: Fetus in fetu
(2017-09-06 17:17) [#11005]
I call this "Fetus in fetu" and this is not covered in my theory.
But thank you for your comment.
184.108.40.206: Re: Fetus in fetu
(2017-09-07 16:11) [#11007]
You call it "fetus in fetu", but does anyone else? I've never heard that medical term used for this kind of life in Go (instead "false eye life", DoubleHeadedDragon, snake/dragon eating its own tail) and I don't see the allusion of a little version of something living in a bigger one: the 2 false eyes are equal in importance. So I'd suggest calling it by a more familiar name.
220.127.116.11: Living inside
(2017-09-07 17:16) [#11008]
In your example white is living inside black
(2017-09-07 17:17) [#11009]
Thank you for your response.
I will consider changing it
: False eye misnomer?
(2018-03-21 22:43) [#11098]
It seems to me that calling these eyes false means one’s definition of ‘false eye’ is unsatisfactory.
18.104.22.168: Re: False eye misnomer?
(2018-05-17 15:09) [#11117]
After I have discovered the property of omitting corner stones in the squares as being equal to the number of connections to other squares, I would no longer refer to eyes as being false. I would rather say that there are too few connections to other squares or too many omitted corner stones