RobertJasiek: The "sharpness" is misleading, especially if everything is deleted that describes why area and territory scoring are strategically equally demanding in practice. The page does not convey a NPOV.
I think that the page has a neutral point of view. The strategic challenge of getting the last move with a final ko under area scoring is explained and exemplified with a pro game. As for the relative sharpness of territory scoring, what is meant is also explained and exemplified in a straightforward, factual way. The discussion was moved to a footnote, which can be edited if it is not satisfactory.