Forum for Sealing in by cutting across

WME? [#2614]

Back to forum     Back to page

New reply

tapir: WME? (2011-08-24 16:03) [#8682]

Hi Dieter, I am happy that you are editing again. I wonder however why it is my signed question that gets removed, while the older contributions of Charles (you removed signatures once) remain as authoritative content. I find the 3rd diagram in the intermediate hane discussion hard to stomach and almost surely displaying a mistake. Creating a cutting point in gote, is not going to be efficient (Black can answer with a bigger move on the outside if the cutting point has any meaning at all), i believe it is fairly easy to show this by tewari.

From Fujisawa Hideyuki's Tesuji Dictionary (vol. I, p.63) - add W10 to achieve 3rd diagram-esque position  

I have also doubts that B6 in the second diagram of the intermediate hane discussion is really the main move to consider, peacefully drawing back (like in the dictionary example) at least deserves attention as well. And while White lost something, it also gained a potential cut. I found the whole discussion really lacking. I still think the same, but are less timid in expressing this thought now then when I found it first two years ago. (I got a little stronger too.)

Best, Tapir

reply ((no subject)) (2011-08-24 09:45) [#8683]

Hi tapir,

I thought your remark was covered in the first diagrams. Maybe I was careless. I'll reread it again. Be assured there is never a notion of personality or strength in my wmes. I only try to consider which diagrams are relevant.

Indeed I still try to remove signed stuff or convert it into unsigned.

I'll have a look again.

tapir: Re: ((no subject)) (2011-08-24 11:09) [#8684]

Actually, I am not obsessed with my comment, but I doubt the discussion of the intermediate hane has much merit as it stands. (The diagram was indeed a duplicate to the one on top of the page.) Re: ((no subject)) (2011-08-24 11:55) [#8685]

Should we just remove that diagram then?

tapir: Re: ((no subject)) (2011-08-24 12:06) [#8686]

You did already (remove the duplicate diagram) :)

I am not happy w/ the intermediate hane discussion. Re: ((no subject)) (2011-08-24 13:17) [#8687]

i mean remove that one

tapir: Re: ((no subject)) (2011-08-24 15:56) [#8688]

I moved the intermediate hane question to a discussion subpage, I would be happy about any takers. This thread can be removed after obsolete. (I moved my points to the subpage as well.)

Back to forum     Back to page

New reply

Forum for Sealing in by cutting across
RecentChanges · StartingPoints · About
Edit page ·Search · Related · Page info · Latest diff
[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
Search position
Page history
Latest page diff
Partner sites:
Go Teaching Ladder
Login / Prefs
Sensei's Library