Forum for Direct Comparison
Direct comparison is a flawed tie breaker. [#1299]
bass: Direct comparison is a flawed tie breaker.
(2008-02-26 22:29) [#4407]
Using direct comparison as a tie breaker thinking it is a shortcut for a rematch is flawed.
See Rematch, Bass's rant or the ![[ext]](images/extlink.gif)
actual text of the AGA "recommendation" for further information.
I removed the flawed suggestion from the page.
86.148.40.103: Re: Direct comparison is a flawed tie breaker.
(2008-02-27 00:25) [#4408]
IanDavis: I think the only advantage it has it that is simple and obvious for two tied players. I cannot think of another advantage.
213.73.65.204: Re: Direct comparison is a flawed tie breaker.
(2008-02-27 08:27) [#4415]
RobertJasiek: Please discuss on DirectComparison/Discussion what you consider related to direct comparision. Just statements like "it is flawed" or "page XY contains arguments" are not convincing at all.
![[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]](images/stone-hello.png "Sensei's Library")