BeginnerExercise164/Solution:page info & history, related pages, related changes
Diff: previous diff ·
Current page: | version 11 | modified on September 13, 2024 - 10:28 | by hnishy |
Archived page: | version 9 | modified on July 3, 2013 - 06:05 | by zxb |
Edit summary: "minor cleanup"
Switch to diff-in-page view.
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | edit block |
==== Solution ==== | |
- $$B 6 at 1 | |
+ $$B W6 at B1 | |
$$ ---------------- | |
$$ | . . . . . . . . | |
$$ | . O O 7 . . . . |
@@ -14,15 +14,11 @@ | edit block |
$$ | . . X , . . . . | |
$$ | . . . . . . . . | |
- This [squeeze] sequence is a fairly standard sequence. If W4 at B5 then B5 at B7. | |
+ B1 and B3! is the key. This [squeeze] is a fairly standard sequence. If W4 at B5 then B5 captures at B7. | |
- In fact, there is something similar in one of the [small nadare] josekis. | |
+ (In fact, there is something similar in one of the [small nadare] josekis.) | |
- | |
- | |
- | |
- | |
- $$B 7 at 1 | |
+ $$B B7 at B1 | |
$$ ---------------- | |
$$ | . . . . . . . . | |
$$ | . O O . . . . . |
@@ -36,11 +32,7 @@ | edit block |
$$ | . . X , . . . . | |
$$ | . . . . . . . . | |
- shinkenjoe: Wouldn´t white sacrifice the three stones to live in the corner ? something like this ? | |
- | |
- [gogobera]: so, is this an overplay by white?? | |
- | |
- [zxb]: yes, this is still an overplay by white. If white sacrifice the three stones to live in the corner, you can see how black's stones all become connected and strong, while white's left group still needs to crawl on the second line for life. Black's position is much, much better than white's. | |
+ White may sacrifice the three stones to live in the corner, but Black's stones all become connected and strong, while White's left group still needs to crawl on the second line for life. Black is much better. | |
%%%% | |
%%%% |
Referenced by
BeginnerExercise164