Might be a good idea, Herman, though I am not quite sure how much it would help. I think we would still want these pages as aliases, so that they can be linked without fuss. But having the real pages as sub-pages would perhaps be tidier and make them visible from the page CGT.

An alternative would be to create a terse alphabetical page, CGT Terminology?, with short definitions linking to the appropriate explanatory pages; that would have the disadvantage that it would be much harder to link clearly to the definitions, and moreover, unfortunately, we cannot link to HTML anchors in an alias. (I also wish that a targeted anchor were highlighted – on Wikipedia I use CSS to ensure that; I do not know if Firefox lets me do that for arbitrary sites, and anyway I think it would help everyone.)