Forum for Irremovable liberties
Inconsistent [#3025]
New reply
OscarBear:
Inconsistent
(2014-06-05 15:58) [#10132]
Surely an irremovable liberty should be described as a single point eye. Two say that it can be 2 false eyes seems to be inconsistent with the definition given on FalseEye.
tapir:
Re: Inconsistent
(2014-06-05 16:20) [#10133]
it is an endless discussion whether a two-headed dragon features two false eyes or two eyes which look as if false. there are pages from each point of view in SL. (see e.g. false eye life for a page from the first perspective, two-headed dragon itself for the second one.)
Slarty:
Re: Inconsistent
(2014-06-06 01:13) [#10134]
The problem is "really" about quantity. They are only irremovable once there are two, and then only clearly so for not-big eyes. It only takes one "irremovable liberty" to live, but whatever, this should be clear enough.
New reply
![[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]](images/stone-hello.png "Sensei's Library")