Forum for Basic endgame theory
no endgame theory can beat actually reading all the possible combinations [#2249]
: no endgame theory can beat actually reading all the possible combinations
(2010-04-02 16:47) [#7600]
Is there any amateur player doing this? This is probably just intimidating for a "basic endgame" page. Cheers Tapir
184.108.40.206: ((no subject))
(2015-02-14 21:49) [#10401]
I think that was intended to mean something like: "These are theories, not end-all solutions. Blindly following the scenarios outlined here is not as strong as actually reading the board state and applying the underlying principles these situations exemplify."