Forum for Keshi

"reduce" should be an alias for "reducing" [#1081]

Back to forum     Back to page

New reply

 
reply
xela: "reduce" should be an alias for "reducing" (2007-07-31 07:12) [#3645]

At the moment, reduce is an alias for keshi, and if someone wants to know what the word actually means then they need to follow another link to get to reducing. I think this is confusing.

I would like to make reduce an alias for reducing. Any objections?

reply
Unkx80: ((no subject)) (2007-07-31 11:28) [#3647]

You mean make both reduce and reducing as aliases to reduction. No objections.

reply
PJTraill: “Keshi” and “reduction” seem redundant (2018-01-28 18:20) [#11071]

Now all these are aliases for keshi: { Erasing, Erasure, Reduce, Reducing, ReducingMove, ReductionPlay }, but all the information about reduction is at reduction. Surely keshi and reduction should be merged?

If in fact keshi (on its own) has other meanings too (e.g. includes ajikeshi), then this should be stated on keshi.

 
Back to forum     Back to page

New reply


[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
RecentChanges
StartingPoints
About
RandomPage
Search position
Page history
Latest page diff
Partner sites:
Go Teaching Ladder
Goproblems.com
Login / Prefs
Tools
Sensei's Library