One-Two-Three example 2
Keywords: Tactics
An example for the principle at One-Two-Three, from a recent article I wrote for the American Go Journal.
here is poor style. White has lost the chance of a ladder with White at
, and still must play
.
Additionally, has forced Black to strengthen
. The two stones
+
are much stronger than the single stone
was.
here looks like a possible mistake of the same type. Omitting
and simply playing at
is normally better style in attacking.
Using the tewari technique, we can ask: would Black really play here? There seem to be many better points, such as a to d.