Couldn't the SGFs of diagrams please be improved?
Let me first remind you that ";" starts a SGF node, it does not end it! Now look at the second diagram of Counting Problem 1 / Solution. Its SGF reads
(;GM[1]FF[4]SZ[19] GN[White takes and wins.] PC[http://senseis.xmp.net/?CountingProblem1/Solution]AP[GoWiki:2009] DT[2009-04-22] C[Diagram from http://senseis.xmp.net/?CountingProblem1/Solution
White takes and wins.] PL[W]
AB[ga][ia][gb][hb][jb][gc][ic][gd] AW[ja][ka][la][lb][hc][jc][kc][lc][hd][id][jd] CR[ia]
;W[ib]C[W1]MN[1] ;W[kb]C[W3]MN[3]
;CR[ia] )
Notice that
The improved SGF would be
(;GM[1]FF[4]SZ[19] GN[White takes and wins.] SO[http://senseis.xmp.net/?CountingProblem1/Solution] AP[GoWiki:2009] DT[2009-04-22] PL[W]MN[1] C[Turn on "All moves with number".]
AB[ga][ia][gb][hb][jb][gc][ic][gd] AW[ja][ka][la][lb][hc][jc][kc][lc][hd][id][jd]
;W[ib] ;B[]C[pass] ;W[kb]
CR[ia] C[Diagram from http://senseis.xmp.net/?CountingProblem1/Solution] C[] C[White takes and wins.] )
Correction: The end of my improved SGF would have to be a single comment, quote
Only one of each property is allowed per node, e.g. one cannot have two comments in one node.