![[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]](images/stone-hello.png "Sensei's Library")
the wordings call up a strong association with RJ. I respect this person, but repeated terms like "strategic" heavily occlude this text.
" strategically alive stones remain that then surround empty points that before were not surrounded by either player's stones because typically those empty points were in between strategically alive stones of one player and strategically dead stones of his opponent. "
worse, however, is the observation (again) that RJ appears to use SL as an index into his own pages. I have previously drawn the attention to this recurring attitude of removing the flesh from the wiki, and leaving just some bones behind.
note that i have no proof that RJ actually provided the content, but the end result remains: SL becomes dependent on external content, that can potentially dissolve in thin air at any moment.
this kind of attitude should be strongly discouraged.
The text you refer to is in the Discussion section. It is fine there, but should really have been signed by the author. It is also fine to delete it, or move it to a discussion sub-page, as part of a WME.
External links are fine, as long as they are relevant to the page and not required to understand the content (So that if the links go dead, their removal does not prevent the page from being understood)