Confusing sentence [#1224]
New reply
205.248.101.84:
Confusing sentence
(2007-12-05 01:46) [#4110]
I have a question about the comment in this position:
Suppose the marked stone is added. Now is sente. If was played at a then the addition of white stones at and b would not be sente at all.
Calvin: Are you suggesting that this ('b' in the previous diagram) is sente by itself? How?
xela:
((no subject))
(2007-12-05 04:49) [#4111]
I can't see how it's sente.
Maybe it's a badly worded version of a slightly different idea: if white has a stone at either or b then in the first diagram is sente.
New reply