This page contains discussions on errors in problems in Life and Death by James Davies.
Babibo: in the text of diagram 3 of chapter 4, the author talks about 12 6-point shapes. This is actually the number of 5-point shapes. There are 35 six-point shapes.
maruseru: In chapter 5 ("One-space notchers") the explanation to the solution of problem 6 (diagram 6b on page 33) says that here kills (as well as another given solution).
Does this sequence not refute that statement, trapping the three white stones in the corner?
Herman: Yes. The hane on the other side is correct, but this one fails. It would work if there was a white stone at a.
Babibo: Added an extra stone to prevent a possible cut at the marked stone which could affect the status of the group (very minor, but could be misleading).
Babibo: Instead of playing at 3, Black can play tenuki : he is already alive.
The author writes "and things might go still worse for him if Black played 6 at 8".
Babibo: this sentence is just wrong. Now I'd like to know what James Davies intended to say.
Babibo: I've seen this reported as a mistake, although it isn't. In the book, James Davies explains that "if White plays 2, Black plays 3 and lives". However, one has to think about Black 5, which is needed to prevent White's shenanigans in the corner.
Continuing, Black may play 9 to avoid a seki : playing at the marked point would result in a seki (although depending on the outside, the seki may be better for him).
One has to be very careful in these sequences. In particular, White can seki if Black saves his stone in atari after 8. Once again, going for a small life or seki is an endgame matter.
If White plays the 1-2 point, Black needs to play the other one (otherwise, Black can threaten a bent-four).
Babibo: Here, White can omit 4 and take sente to play elsewhere. Black can only start a thousand year ko which, in most games, will end up in a seki. However, White has to be aware that he needs to pay attention to his number of ko threats.
Babibo: This other sequence, which can lead to a thousand-year ko if Black decides to go for it is deemed inferior (at the very least, the text implies it). However, Davies doesn't mention that this sequence is sente for White (unless Black decides that he can leave it after w5, and let him have life). Given that a thousand-year ko often leads to seki, the ko option looks better to me.
Babibo: It is wrong to say that "White's position is even worse" (compared to Black's). It appears that Davies didn't consider the possibility of ignoring one threat, playing an external liberty and then connect the ko, thus making an eye in Black's stomach.
White captures the ko with 2, Black plays a first threat (3), White ignores, Black plays a second threat, and White connects.
To sum up, it is a 2-stage ko for Black, and a 2-step ko for White.
Babibo: The marked stone (missing in the book) is important for the problem to work. Without it, White can threaten an escape and gain liberties in many sequences.