One-Two-Three example 2
Keywords: Tactics
An example for the principle at One-Two-Three, from a recent article I wrote for the American Go Journal.
here is poor style. White has lost the chance of a ladder with White at
, and still must play
.
Additionally,
has forced Black to strengthen
. The two stones
+
are much stronger than the single stone
was.
here looks like a possible mistake of the same type. Omitting
and simply playing at
is normally better style in attacking.
Using the tewari technique, we can ask: would Black really play
here? There seem to be many better points, such as a to d.
![[Diagram]](../../diagrams/20/4514c50aec42ddf0a7a53e56d097cd1a.png)
![[Diagram]](../../diagrams/39/891bd394aabf2fb5345aab43afbc54be.png)
![[Diagram]](../../diagrams/44/1d28eed0b2fa5c61b9f2b4321544df3b.png)
![[Diagram]](../../diagrams/47/6e2abc030f6cb3ff8599faf40c8b8dbc.png)
2024 the Authors,
published under the ![Sensei's Library [Welcome to Sensei's Library!]](../../images/stone-hello.png)