MoGo vs Steenvreter
MoGo (white) against Steenvreter at ICGA 2007 tournament.
http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/icga/round.php?tournament=169&round=9&id=2
Sylvain Gelly (MoGo author) gives MoGo mainline at and
.
http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/2007-June/010122.html
![[Diagram]](../../diagrams/10/3df1a5a1f2913cc98cfa8d70a1216211.png)
MoGo mainline at move 34
Winning probability estimation 74%. is stupid and the line is too optimistic.
![[Diagram]](../../diagrams/9/e526964c6d45b88350c9586a6ed46ab3.png)
MoGo mainline at move 36
Estimation 81%. is odd.
Magnus Persson (Viking author): "Normally making an eye is good in the semeai, and in random playouts it is a winning move in this position. But here it gives black time to win the semeai against the stones which are not protected by the eye."
http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/2007-June/010129.html
Persson initially believed that the sequence to is a disaster for Mogo playing white. But:
"I don't quite see why this position is lost for white. What is the refutation for White A5?" Magnus: There is no refutation - I have a blind spot for this move... This is a reason I think these programs will be hard to beat on 9x9 soon for me at least. I overlook too many weird moves that works well.
![[Diagram]](../../diagrams/5/9be641d5f4cc6d944fc901f072759c44.png)
MoGo mainline refuted
connects at
. The line is given by Seo Sanghyeon
http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/2007-June/010125.html