How to lie with tewari

Path: SequencingQuestions   · Prev: Tewari   · Next: Transposition
  Difficulty: Expert   Keywords: Theory

Certain arguments are based on tewari but may be questionable as applied in practice. Typically they re-order a sequence in such a way that one player is thought to gain on balance out of two identifiable mistakes or poor exchanges, one of which counts against Black and one against White.

If each of those could really be quantified as a loss of a certain number of points, then they could be set against each other for a conclusion that the sequence as a whole changed the score by the difference involved (that is, assuming all the other plays involved no loss at all). The tewari technique of permuting plays would be justified, because the loss made in the transition from the initial to the final position really doesn't depend on the path taken.

Suspicions are aroused, in general, by this kind of argument. It probably applies well enough in many endgame positions. It is much harder to be sure of the reasoning when looking at a sub-board, or in complex middle game positions.

Pros do use tewari - I was shown an example by Sonoda Yuichi as applied to a purported 'joseki'. Generally speaking, the more reputable applications of tewari reasoning are one-sided: after re-ordering the sequence, one of the players is seen to have done something loss-making or unnatural, while the other player's choices seem normal and good.

Charles Matthews

Bill: As the game progresses, tewari loses much of its force. For instance, the result of shinogi may be a group of several stones that make only two points of territory in its two eyes. Considered by itself, such a group is very inefficient. However, it may be the result of a game-winning invasion. But in the opening, tewari is an excellent heuristic to see whether stones are working well together. Because the board is open, a player will very often have an option to play a stone such that, if it were already on the board, the other stones that have already been played would be good moves. By contrast, a play that makes one or more of those previous plays not so good is probably inferior.


Example, from actual SL practice

Dieter: However, in terms of tewari ...

[Diagram]

Tewari

taken from peep at a tiger's mouth

... if there were a solid rather than a hanging connection, B2 is somewhat misplaced and would be better at a.

Bill: And W1 is ridiculous. ;-).
Dieter: Hmmm, I know it is not really tewari, but is the argument that this exchange is a little better for White false then ?
Charles This kind of argument is why I created a how to lie with tewari page ...
Bill: It's close on an empty board. My feeling is that it's about 50-50.
If both W1 and B2 are correct, of course it is an even exchange. Both players have alternatives.
Otherwise, the question is whether it was bad to make the tiger's mouth. Plainly not. (Although there were alternatives, of course.) The peep is part of the cost of making the tiger's mouth, that's all.

Path: SequencingQuestions   · Prev: Tewari   · Next: Transposition
This is a copy of the living page "How to lie with tewari" at Sensei's Library.
(OC) 2009 the Authors, published under the OpenContent License V1.0.
[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
StartingPoints
ReferenceSection
About