Ten Go/ Discussion

Sub-page of TenGo

Dieter: It is not clear to me who is the source of information here. Generally I prefer the following format for a commercial product.

  • Information: what it is, where to find it
  • User comments: how well it works, comparison to other products. These comments are preferably signed.

In the current shape, this page looks like an advertisement.

MarkD: Well, this may apply to MadLab too. (price $29). But I guess this problem applies to many more pages, KGS could be considered advertisment for Kiseido, information pages about where to buy equipment too, book reviews are advertisment for the publisher etc.

My personal opinion: If the stuff that is sold is strictly go related we should allow it, it is useful to select a product and read user opinions. (positive and negative)

Dieter: Sure, it has its place here. But statements like "product X has a better interface than product Y" should IMO not be weaved into the release information by the author. I do nnot say that this is the case, but it is not clear that it is not the case.

MarkD: I agree Dieter, comments like this should be omitted from the author. (Even though he is right this time, I love tengo and the very friendly and helpful support team)


This is a copy of the living page "Ten Go/ Discussion" at Sensei's Library.
(OC) 2009 the Authors, published under the OpenContent License V1.0.
[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
StartingPoints
ReferenceSection
About