Taxonomy Test

   

This is a test page for TaxonomyOfJoseki. Please let me know what you think - would it make sense to add diagrams like this to that page?

4-4 point Josekis (covered in Ishida volume 3):

double kakari kosumitsuke joseki 4-4 point low approach low extension 4-4 point low approach large low extension 4-4 point low approach high extension 4-4 point low approach large high extension 4-4 point low approach, diagonal contact then pincer 4-4 point low approach diagonal #1 4-4 point low approach one-space low pincer 4-4 point low approach one-space high pincer 4-4 point low approach two-space low pincer 4-4 point low approach two-space high pincer 4-4 point low approach three-space low pincer 4-4 point low approach three-space high pincer double kakari
[Diagram]

Approach

4-4 point very low approach 4-4 point high approach
[Diagram]

Other 4-4



[1] Black attaches: ->


Discussion

Problems I see:

  • The bullets don't indent when they're placed next to a diagram
  • Subdivisions by follow-up (W3) can not be rendered by points
  • The taxonomy is not exactly by moves - there are some that share the same B2, such as in footnote [1]. Is this by design or could this be changed?

Questions:

  • Should we generally represent tenuki by the 1-1 point?

Charles Duplication at the level of indexes need not be bad. But doesn't this repeat what is said at 4-4 point josekis?

By the way, there is now enough material at SL that we can confidently drop references like Ishida volume 3.

A better tenuki convention might be a T-shape made out of square-marked points?


This is a copy of the living page "Taxonomy Test" at Sensei's Library.
(OC) 2008 the Authors, published under the OpenContent License V1.0.
[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
StartingPoints
ReferenceSection
About