Unremovable Ko Threat

Path: SecondCourseOnKo   · Prev: GoResearchOnKo   · Next: Placid
    Keywords: Ko

An unremovable ko threat is a ko threat which cannot be removed without also executing the threat.

[Diagram]

Unremovable ko threat

Unremovable ko threats sometimes (always? all the ones I've seen...) occur in seki positions; here is an example. White has a ko threat here at a, which Black can never remove. Removing the ko-threat would mean Black playing at a himself, which of course leads to instant capture.


[Diagram]

One-sided unremovable ko threat

chewtonic: If Black answers White's move at a by playing at b (diagram above), White loses points. There is a class of positions which could be called 'one-sided unremovable ko threats' where one player loses nothing with their threat. See diagram on left.

Black can play any of the internal points as a threat that loses nothing (leaving a position similar to the first diagram if White answers), whereas White cannot threaten anything. If a bent four in the corner happens in another corner, Black would feel cheated, under Japanese rules. Note that if you reversed the colours in the bent four in the corner diagram, you would need to reverse the colours in this diagram too, to create a similar situation for White.

cliftut; notice, though, that whoever plays first in this diagram can gain sente. If white plays one of the points first, black has to pick which is more important to him, filling in ko, or getting 10 points in the corner:

  • If black fills in ko, then white can create seki in the corner(this would be pointless, of course, if winning ko gave black 10 points or more). This is also assuming white can take no further action to save points after losing ko(ko for life).
  • If black prevents seki by playing in the corner, white can take back ko and the fight continues. This loses 10 points for white, though, so it could only be played if winning ko kept white from losing over ten points, and if there were no more ko threats(at least no large ones, depending on how much winning ko is worth.)

I hope I made sense. If not, say so and I'll try to make a diagram. As far as I can tell, though, my comment is valid, if only in very paticular situations(depending on who gains or loses more by winning ko, and exactly how much ko is worth to each player). I just wanted to show that this may not be completely 'one-sided'. If anyone can see a flaw in my logic, please point it out.

yong?: cliftut, you dont make sense, it is seki without white playing.


Path: SecondCourseOnKo   · Prev: GoResearchOnKo   · Next: Placid
This is a copy of the living page "Unremovable Ko Threat" at Sensei's Library.
(OC) 2007 the Authors, published under the OpenContent License V1.0.
[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
StartingPoints
ReferenceSection
About