Odd Dots Go Ongoing Game

    Keywords: Life & Death, Ongoing game

blubb proposed the following arrangement in MaximumNumberOfLiveGroups. This looks beautifully symmetric as it is, but I'd like to sacrifice its immaculate beauty by playing it. -- (Sebastian)

Note that this original setup is higly unbalanced, mainly chosen to get the maximum string count (here: 181). By abandoning a single stone, we can get a well balanced starting position which is even more symmetric. See Dots Go Ongoing Game.


[Diagram]

Current Position - Last Move marked


[Diagram]

181 strings - but seki? moves 20+x

Tas: B1 Lets see if we can get another eye or catch some white. (Which is of course also making another eye).

Phelan: W2 trying to stop black from making an eye.

Tas: B3 well this makes thickness and a definate escape, we must be able to get the second eye later. It seems that shapes can almost allways live here. A web wide enough to prevent escape makes plenty of inside space for eyes. I don't think its seki. The endgame will be interesting though

An extra thought: Maybe we should be playing more strategically for influence and territory, instead of these live-and-kill tactics.

NickGeorge: W4 Methinks if I were black, I'd want to play at 4, getting a double sided wall (or 4 sided...). So, it seems big to prevent black from doing that.

Tas: B5 Lets try an influence minded tenuki. I was considering a though.

Edit: Changed my mind and swapped them. This can't be bad. a is what I had played before.

Mef: W6 need a move here to live, this looks as good as any.

unkx80: B7.


[Diagram]

181 strings - but seki? moves 10-20

Frieder -- B1 - Well lets Build an eye - W2 - Prevent Black from living - B3 Black escapes - ... (No comment) - W6, B7, W8 W is living. B9 Black Begin to build his second eye


[Diagram]

181 strings - but seki? moves 1 to 10

B1 - no idea if this is a good move. Let's see what happens. -- (Sebastian)

W2 - same here :) -- blubb

B3 - Here's my thought process:

  1. I have the eery feeling that whoever starts at a given place has no chance of getting life there him/herself, because the opponent can always block just enough.
  2. But wait a minute - isn't that always the case in Go? The only difference is that it's hard to see interaction between remote stones.
  3. I'm considering retracting my move to tenuki and try out if there is any of if it is all neutralized by the stones in between.
  4. But if I tenuki than you definitely can make life at B3.
  5. It really seems like anyone who moves at a place increases primarily his/her opponent's chance to win at that place.
  6. Is that a negative temperature?
  7. If you choose to move at 4, I'll move at 5, which starts something like a ladder via 6. So there is remote interaction after all!
  8. No, it's not like a ladder. After one more move, you get to choose if you want to go straight or bend it.
  9. This reminds me a bit of the game we call "Käsekästchen" (little cheese box) in German.
 -- (Sebastian)

Arno: B7: W cannot save her stones on the second line. I think B has an easy win :o)

(Sebastian: B9 - No idea what Arno had in mind, but this can't be wrong.

blubb: W10 - Just let's see :)


Something might be interesting to note:

[Diagram]

Odd positions are already played, only circles can be played.

Until a capture is made, the players can only play on even positions, no?

[Diagram]

A single stone in the center has 6 liberties.

Note that B1 creates 6 liberties.

[Diagram]

White attacking in response

White's attack there has reduced the liberties for both stones (B1 and W2) to 3+2.

[Diagram]

Liberties at the center, sides and corners.

Play on an a would result in 3 liberties for both black and white.

A white play on a b would result in 3 liberties, whereas a black one would result in 4.

White stones played on cs would have the full 6 liberties, whereas black ones would only have 5.

Viewed this way, white seems to be at an advantage as there as there are 4 more c squares on a board. (Yet it would be harder for white to cut a black b from expanding inwards than it would be for black to cut a white b.)

I don't know... how would you analyze such a game?


All in all, this looks like a modified version of Go on a different grid, the interesting thing being that the grid is slightly different for the black and the white.

-- aib


Heres another 181-stringy monster. I don't really think it's stable. Who knows? (According to the ruleset, chose komi so that, if considered to be a "global seki", it's a tie: 0 in japanese, 3 in chinese counting.) -- blubb

[Diagram]

181 strings again - but seki?

I think on this one, White has the best chance to get some life. The first black ring (from the center) is dead, and White can salvage it. At least I have no idea how black could prevent that. -- (Sebastian)

[Diagram]

Is the innermost black ring really dead?


This is a copy of the living page "Odd Dots Go Ongoing Game" at Sensei's Library.
(OC) 2007 the Authors, published under the OpenContent License V1.0.
[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]
StartingPoints
ReferenceSection
About