![]() StartingPoints No references
|
Net Go / Discussion
Sub-page of NetGo
Discussion of the NetGo rulesArticle 1Ellbur: If the object of an alliance is to occupy the greatest territory: Does this mean more territoy than the other alliances, or just the greatest total territory for the one alliance? What is the object of the players? Do they want one of their alliances to win? Do they want all of their alliances to be superior to others? When does an alliance 'win'? When does a player 'win'? How should the players consider their object relative to the success of the other players? Should they try to do better than others or best for themselves? The rules don't answer any of these questions. doraguma: Good points! I think, if for example A has 50, B has 40, and C has 60, the alliance C should be first, A second, and B third winner. There is no rule, if a player has won, or not. Only the alliances count. If one of the players in an alliance is not so strong, (s)he reduces the ability of the alliance. If there are no non-color alliances, the player is supposed to play in favour for the alliance. (If not, he/she will not be invited often to play ;-) ) Of course all playing alliances can consist of only of one player. I had no ideas for non-color alliance rules, yet. Article 6 (ko)doraguma: I am not sure, if this ko rule is the best extension for a multi player Go. What do you think? This is a copy of the living page "Net Go / Discussion" at Sensei's Library. ![]() |