![]() StartingPoints Paths Sub-pages Referenced by
|
Basic endgame theory
Path: Endgame · Prev: PlayingInfinitesimals · Next: SenteVsGoteWhichToPlay
Difficulty: Beginner Keywords: EndGame, Theory
The endgame is all about knowing which plays are sente, which gote, and their relative sizes. Gote plays are worth half of sente playsBillSpight: Why you divide the deiri value of a gote by 2. Here is a simple 3 point gote (deiri).
If Black cuts off the White stone, the local score is 3 points (for Black). If White saves it, the local score is 0. We may represent this position like this: {3 | 0} On average, this position is worth 1 1/2 points. On average, a move gains 1 1/2 points. The miai value of a play is 1 1/2 points, but the deiri value is 3 points. The deiri value is the difference between 3 and 0, which are separated by 2 plays, not 1 (1 play for Black, 1 for White). If you want to add and subtract plays, you must use miai values, and to convert the deiri value of a gote to its miai value, you divide by 2. It's no more complicated than that. Why you do not divide the deiri value of sente. Here is a simple 3 point sente.
If Black cuts off all the White stones, the result is 10 points. If White connects to the single stone and Black cuts off the rest, the result is 7 points. If Black lets White save all of them, the result is 0. We may represent this position like this: {10 | {7 | 0}} The average value of this position is 7. If Black plays his reverse sente, he gains 3 points (on average). If White connects to the single stone, her threat is worth 3 1/2 points, which is more than Black's reverse sente. When the biggest play elsewhere is worth more than 3 points but less than 3 1/2 points, White will normally be able to make this play with sente, and Black will not be able to afford to play the reverse sente first. So we call it White's sente. It turns out that the deiri value of a sente is the same as its miai value, because there is only one net play between the sente result and the reverse sente result. No conversion is necessary. For instance, the deiri value of our example is 3 points (10 - 7), the same as the miai value (10 - 7)/1. Discussion of the value of sente and gote plays Play double sente points firstIn double sente points, it is first come, first serve. Often, the 'threat' behind the sente play is much larger than the value of the play if answered, so you can count on your opponent answering the sente play, even though the actual value of the sente play is smaller than the overall goban 'hotness'. Comment: Double sente can look misleadingly small, so their "apparent" value may be smaller than the ambient temperature. However, if their actual value is not greater than that, they are not double sente (as a rule). -- BillSpight See types of endgame sente plays. Play sente points which have a large 'threat'
Since sente is important, you may find that your opponent does not always answer what you consider a sente play, but plays a sente play of his own. If the 'threat' behind his sente play is larger than yours, you will have to answer his sente play. You have then given him sente, and he can play the sente plays in his order. Of course, he will have to finish in sente to come back and answer your original play. Play gote points which have a sente follow-upThe value of gote points can be larger if the follow-up to a gote play is sente. You should play these before you play 'purely' gote plays. (The concept of sente is of course relative and not allways black/white). A slightly related topic is Reverse Sente. Comment: The extra potential lies in the fact that the sente follow-up may be used as a ko threat. Other than that, when choosing among plays of about the same size, it is typically better to pick one with a sizable follow-up over one without one. See Infinitesimals. -- BillSpight Captures are rarely worth takingThe simplest capture is a stone in a ko which does not threaten the group - this stone has no value but one half a point and is not worth taking.
The two-stone string has also a deceptively low value of only 1 point.
If Black captures at the circled point, White does not have to respond. Black can then connect (in gote) and make one point of territory plus two stones captured for a total of three points, but both moves are gote! 1.5 points in gote per move is not very good. Comment: The average value of the original position is 1 point. Black gains 1 point by taking, and another point by connecting. -- BillSpight
The three-stone string may look big, but is only worth around 5 points with 2 gote plays - 2 and a half points gote per move is again not very good. Comment: The original position is worth slightly less than 2 points. Taking is worth slightly less than 2 points. Connecting after that is worth a bit more than 1 point. -- Bill Spight Using Ogawa's endgame theory, this would be the way to evaluate the move in order to prioritize: (Ogawa uses miai counting)
... 3, he makes an additional 2 points in gote.
Follow-up moves to gote moves are counted half their value. So the total value would be 3 + 2/2 = 4.
If, however, White answers with 2, Black has taken three stones and lost one stone, but he did so in sente ...
Comment: For counting, we do not assume an immediate reply. -- BillSpight
He can follow up with
This is a follow-up move to a sente move, and should be counted its proper value. Moreover, he can steal another stone in ko later, but the added value of that is already close to zero (1/4 AAMOF). So in total, the move is now worth (slightly more than) 5 points (= (3-1)x2 + 1). This already tells us that White will recapture not too soon.
Comment: After
For White to recapture means: 2 points in gote + 1 point in gote (= 2.5 points).
Comment: If Black plays at
If White saves her stones, the result is 0, of course. So I have added some precision, but Dieter's analysis is certainly close enough for practical play. :-) -- BillSpight These values only serve to prioritize when a lot of moves are available. When only a few (3 to 5) endgame moves are available, it is far easier and more accurate to imagine the several orders in which the moves can be played, still keeping the basic endgame theory in mind. Tom: I have an Endgame Question Path: Endgame · Prev: PlayingInfinitesimals · Next: SenteVsGoteWhichToPlay This is a copy of the living page "Basic endgame theory" at Sensei's Library. ![]() |