![]() StartingPoints Sub-pages (up) Referenced by
|
SL Conventions / Discussion
Sub-page of SLConventions
Important parts of this discussion are on these pages:
May 19, 2003 Charles I suppose the conventions business is always going to be evolutionary; but keeping score seems of some interest. As far as I can see there may be these four categories in which to classify: Generally accepted
Recommended by some
Deprecated by some
Deprecated by some and recommended by others
Line LengthAnonymous: Please do not use lines with length greater than 80, it makes the ``diff'' unreadable in the Recent Changes. Arno Hollosi: That is not always possible. E.g. list items have to be in one line. I have added a quick hack that tries to underline small changes in long lines (e.g. correction of a typo). It works quite well. I hope that solves the problem sufficiently. DashesArno Hollosi: I'd like to add that the "no more than four dashes" is questionable. Personally, I just hit '-' a couple of times (or press until auto-repeat sets in). Self LinksSGBailey 2003-10-09: Some articles have self links. I could make one here: SLConventions/Discussion. Are these liked, disliked or forbidden? Personally I feel them to be slightly confusing since I perhaps want to click on it and won't go anywhere new. Sebastian: Even worse are indirect self links: Links to alias pages that eventually link back to the original page. I delete them whenever fall in such a trap. Incidentally, I just did this on Big Eye Liberties. unkx80: I believe one common reason why this happens is because of Wiki Master Editing, the Wiki Master Editor may copy some contents from page A (containing links to page B) into page B while forgetting to remove the links. Mutual AppreciationSebastian: I'm really happy about the prompt and concise replies I get from many people here, above all from Bill and CharlesMatthews. I feel very much inclined to add "thanks" below each of them, but nobody else does this - and rightly so, because it would clutter up SL. Often I subliminate that urge and add another comment/question instead, which contributes to my recent changes addiction, because I have to see if someone responded again ... :-) My question is: What's the best way to express thanks or should we simply forget about it? Charles Well, thanks for that! This is a wiki, not a mutual appreciation society. Those who want to put something back into SL can do it in some way that suits them: maintain older pages, bring new questions. Sebastian: Well, then, I won't publicly appreciate you. A related question is: How to treat signed contributions in non-discussion pages? - See Document Mode vs Thread Mode. This is a copy of the living page "SL Conventions / Discussion" at Sensei's Library. ![]() |