[Welcome to Sensei's Library!]

StartingPoints
ReferenceSection
About


Referenced by
LibraryLobby
MetaDiscussion

 

Korean Dominance Discussion
   

Korea dominates the international Go scene. Japan does the worst of the three great Go nations. Why? We can discuss it with the statements below as a starting points.

  1. The competition in Korea is tougher: more new players, more aspiring pros, faster official progress, more top level matches. Hence: better players.
  2. Japan is still caught in conventional wisdom.
  3. Japanese players concentrate on home titles, which have more prestige in Japan and are more richly funded.
  4. It's a matter of conjuncture. Soon Japan and China will have an era where they prevail.
  5. Korean tournament conditions are the same as the International tournament conditions. In Japan the major titles are best of seven series, with two days for each game. If those conditions would be set on International events, Japan would do a lot better.

Bob McGuigan: Japan just had a convincing win in the Asian Cup team tournament against a very strong Korean team. There was a long period of time in which the Japanese were dominant. Personally I think which country is dominant will change from time to time.

Charles Matthews: I think Yi Se-tol is there because in South Korea there is now a training system designed to find players like him, from a whole cohort. There are other aspects, though. Historians will have a better perspective. One of my theories, shamefully weak as I am to be thinking such thoughts, is that the undoubtedly-great Sakata had a negative influence. If you go back to Chinese pro games from about 1980 on, they are still working on sansan fuseki; it takes them quite a number of years to move the style on. At that point Chinese pros were still assimilating the Japanese way (perhaps first business when their pro system was set up in 1982?). Anyway, it's curious; and the Koreans perhaps not long after that started pursuing a different direction.

John F.: I'm not yet convinced that Korean dominance is quite what it seems. It's true that Korean pros are winning the titles, and that Japanese fans have been gnashing their teeth for quite a while now. But I've been struck by something when I've been entering data into the GoGoD tournament tables. Japanese players seem to hold their end up rather well in the early rounds. If you were to look at figures showing simply wins and losses in international events, rather than titles, I have a feeling you'd find that Korea does not dominate that much. Of course their best are the very best, but when Go Seigen was at his peak it did not mean all Chinese players were good.

Incidentally, the Korean reaction to defeat in the CSK Cup seems a bit OTT. "Waterloo" and "sinking of the Titanic" were two of the analogies I've seen. More likely the truth is fatigue. Yi Se-tol has already pulled out of a Wangwi League game for that reason, and most of the top stars have been commuting to China almost weekly for the Cities League. But that's now been postponed indefinitely, along with all other Chinese events, so the Koreans can get a bit of R&R (rest and recuperation).

Bob McGuigan: It seems to be the case that professional go receives more popular support in Korea than in Japan right now so talented children would be more likely to be found and steered into the professional pipeline in Korea. If I recall correctly, in her book The World of Chinese Go, Guo Juan tells how talented children were almost required to attend professional training school. Of course we reject the chauvinistic notion that one country could be inherently better than another so it is interesting to speculate on what factors contribute to a strong and vital pro go scene in a country. Certainly societal support for professional go as an attractive career must be one of them.

John F.: Well, I think a case could probably be made for saying it was the other way round in Korea - it was the success of Yi Ch'ang-ho that led to public support. One aspect I find intriguing is the rise of the teenybopper. In so many physical sports teenagers are rising to the very top, and we are seeing it also in go and chess. Was it really always like this, but in the past children were expected to stay in the background? If so, maybe the rise of Korea is that they let their kids off the leash first.

Tim Brent: I do agree with the contention that Japanese players may look at the international titles as secondary to their 'home' titles -- just as a Canadian ice hockey player will look at the Stanley Cup as more important than an Olympic or World title. As one who follows professional Go, I admit I try to look at the seven Japanese Big Titles more than the Fujitsu Cup for example.

Bob McGuigan: One of the points raised at the top had to do with the differing time limits in the big Japanese tournaments and the international tournaments. There are many fast tournaments in Japan so I doubt that could really be important. But it seems natural to wonder whether the quality of the go is higher in the long time limit matches. Anybody have anything to say about that?

Charles: I think it is widely believed in Japan that longer time limits imply games of greater depth; I certainly heard this point of view from John Power. If to be a pro is to train for games with 6 hours each, as it has been in Japan, then that sets a basic rhythm for what you are trying to do. Going over games from the 1920s and 1930s, where routine Oteai games were over two days, one does find more examples of complex oyose - that at least is my impression. The classic Cho Hun-hyeon game is more about getting an early lead, somewhat in the way Go Seigen used to.

Bob McGuigan: Certainly there is a difference in character between fast games and long time limit games. There seem to be more chaotic fights in fast games. In commentaries on fast games missed opportunities, presumably due to insufficient reading, are often pointed out. Are there more such in three hour per player games as opposed to six hour per player games?

exswoo: I think everyone is forgetting one simple thing about Go in Korea: that it is VERY popular. There is a seperate Go channel that runs 24/7 (Japan's shares its time with Shogi), and for the education crazy Korean mothers, Go is pretty much the only game that they don't mind sending their children to study, since it supposedly builds the mind, so you have a lot of kids in Korea who are exposed to go when they're 6-7.

There are hundreds of Go academies aimed at children alone, and even people don't play are bound to be exposed to Go when they have to serve their 30 months in the army, since there the only games you can play to to pass the time while you're there is Go and Chinese Chess(the Korean variant). You add to the fact that there are only 191 pros in the Korean Ki-in(pronounced Giwon in Korean), you're bound to have a lot of talented players in the top ranks.



This is a copy of the living page "Korean Dominance Discussion" at Sensei's Library.
(OC) 2003 the Authors, published under the OpenContent License V1.0.