![]() StartingPoints Referenced by
|
Errata In Books Meta Discussion
Actually, the books bear the names of professionals, but with a few exception have not actually been written by them, but by some strong (5D-6D) amateur players. Because of this, go errors sometimes do creep in, as is for example known of the Ishida joseki dictionary. -- Andre Engels We can probably distinguish between three kinds of books:
While I can understand that a book "written by Cho Chikun" sells better than one written by a noble unknown, and while I do not expect that a professional player is better at explaining the rules and basic life and death or tesuji than a six dan amateur, I think it would only be fair when the category a book belongs to becomes common knowledge. It should even in some way be noted in the book itself. Publishers have no right to deceive their readers. --Dieter BillSpight: "Deception" puts it a bit strongly, I think. Even when the ghost-writer is not acknowledged, the named author is responsible for the contents, and, almost surely has at least checked them out. Often, I am sure, there have been discussions previous to and during the writing. There has been a trend (which I welcome) around the world to acknowledge ghostwriters. E. g., "as told to" books. I think that has extended to go books, as well. Recently I have seen go books with both authors acknowledged. :-) This is a copy of the living page "Errata In Books Meta Discussion" at Sensei's Library. (C) the Authors, published under the OpenContent License V1.0. |