# Move one loses the game

### What is the Best First Move?

Kombilo reports the winning percentage for the results that it finds. Here are the percentages from First Move In The Corner:

- In 13,362 games Black wins 53.5% White wins 43.3.% and 2.2% are undecided (jigo, no result, or unknown).
- In Games where
**Black**plays in one or more empty corners at:- Hoshi - B wins 54.7% W wins 44.7% No result 0.6% (precision 1.0%)
- Komoku - B wins 54.0% W wins 43.4% No result 2.6% (precision 0.6%)
- Mokuhazushi - B wins 47.4% W wins 42.8% No result 9.8% (precision 3.0%)
- Takamoku - B wins 47.0% W wins 45.4% No result 7.6% (precision 5.2%)
- San San - B wins 48.2% W wins 51.3% No result 0.6% (precision 5.4%)

- In Games where
**White**plays in one or more empty corners at:- Hoshi - B wins 52.3% W wins 47.1% No result 0.6% (precision 1.0%)
- Komoku - B wins 53.5% W wins 43.9% No result 2.6% (precision 1.0%)
- San San - B wins 55.5% W wins 45.1% No result 0.4% (precision 2.5%)
- Mokuhazushi - B wins 55.7% W wins 37.8% No result 6.5% (precision 3.0%)
- Takamoku - B wins 59.8% W wins 32.6% No result 7.6% (precision 3.8%)

I found these results quite surprising. I had no expectation that there would be such big differences in the results. Keep in mind that in even games there are *four* empty corners at the start of the game. Many fuseki combine more than one of the above plays in different open corners. Despite the fact that most games contributing to the results include more than one of the above plays, the figures shown above indicate a pretty clear difference between Black choosing to play hoshi or komoku and choosing to play the other three! Similarly there is a clear difference between White choosing to play hoshi, komoku, or san san and choosing to play the other two.

Personally I found the results not only surprising but disappointing. I enjoy playing mokuhazushi and actually got tied up in this analysis while trying to prepare some statistics on the use of the Taisha joseki. Unfortunately the figures above seem to cast doubt on the use of mokuhazushi, takamoku, and (by Black at least) san san at all - without ever considering minor matters like the choice of joseki.

Just to be very mathematically rigorous, can you give the precision of the calculations? To do it, you just have to take 1/sqrt(N) where N is the number of games.

- BobMcGuigan: I think this estimate of error depends on the sample being random which, I think, is unlikely in this case.
__Johannes__?: If you don't consider it random, what would be your

concept of "precision"?

- Bob McGuigan: Unfortunately it is not possible to calculate a "precision" for a sample that is not probability based.

For example, if the number of games in the database is 13,362 then we will see that the fluctuations should be less than 1% which means that the statement that Black wins more than White is reliable. If the numebr of games starting with hoshi is, for example, 6,400 then the expected fluctuation would be 1/0.8 % = 1.125%. If the number of games starting with mokuhazushi is 625 then the expected fluctuation is 4% and so on. This does not deny the conclusions drawn from the averages, but puts some limitations on the reliability of the results.

__Johannes__?: If you treat the outcome as being biomial distributed, the standard error of your probability estimates would be sqrt(n(N-n)/N) so it would be lower for low than for high probabilities.

Further, it might happen that the root of the problem is only in one of the lines of continuations. For example, looking at my own games I saw that as White I have slightly better results replying with komoku to the opponent's hoshi. But it turned out that looking a step further I saw that if the opponent chooses parallel fuseki then the results don't differ from average, but if the opponent makes a mistake of challenging me to diagonal fuseki, I win with the ratio of 14:4. So, it was not komoku that increased my winning percentage, but rather the fact that I play that komoku in the adjacent and not the opposite corner and even in that case the opponent has to choose the diagonal fuseki. I don't like moyos.

- I added the "precision" above calculated at 1/sqrt(number of corners played as listed on First Move in the Corner). I have no idea if this is what should be used, though. The point is that winning percentage is calculated by looking at the results of games but each game contains four different corners. I am too lazy to find the number of games for each line (at least right now :-) Do mathmaticians have different ways to assess this situation? DaveSigaty

It would be interesting to group the players by strength and recalculate statistics for each group!

mat

- Agreed. I have calculated Go Seigen, Kitani, Sakata, Cho Chikun, Yi Ch'ang-ho, and Cho Hun-hyeon so far and will post them here shortly - Black and White have to be calculated separately for individuals so I already have 12 tables of results :-( The differences are interesting but tend to reflect what we would expect from their various styles, I think. Dave

### Individual Players' Results

### Go Seigen

373 Games as BlackCorners B wins W wins Other* Overall 1,449 77.5% 19.5% 3.0%Go's Choices Playing BlackKomoku Black 469 81.0% 16.4% 2.6% Hoshi Black 294 80.6% 17.0% 2.4% Mokuhazushi Black 23 65.2% 26.1% 8.7% San San Black 39 59.0% 41.0% 0.0% Takamoku Black 14 57.1% 42.9% 0.0%His Opponents' Choices Playing WhiteSan San White 21 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% Komoku White 306 72.9% 23.9% 3.2% Hoshi White 132 78.8% 20.5% 0.7% Mokuhazushi White 80 77.5% 16.3% 6.2% Takamoku White 51 92.2% 7.8% 0.0%

469 Games as WhiteOverall 1,785 39.2% 55.7% 5.1%His Opponents' Choices Playing BlackTakamoku Black 62 43.5% 50.0% 6.5% Komoku Black 521 41.3% 54.5% 4.2% San San Black 24 37.5% 58.3% 4.2% Hoshi Black 273 37.0% 57.1% 5.9% Mokuhazushi Black 50 36.0% 56.0% 8.0%Go's Choices Playing WhiteMokuhazushi White 16 12.5% 87.5% 0.0% Komoku White 517 37.1% 59.2% 3.7% Hoshi White 201 36.8% 53.7% 9.5% San San White 55 50.9% 47.3% 1.8% Takamoku White 48 56.3% 35.4% 8.3%

- "Other" includes various results that are not wins for either Black or White: jigo, unfinished, result unknown, etc.

Anonymous: Are these statistics that meaningful? Maybe the only conclusion to draw is "The weaker player should choose non-standard moves." That by itself may account for the difference.

Fhayashi: Huh? The only conclusion is Hoshi and Komoku (and as white, San San) seem to be the best opening play, unless you're Go Seigen, in which case you should be playing Mokuhazushi more often as white...

Harpreet: It's likely to be more complicated than this. There are very different numbers for how many times each move has been tried. 4-4 and 3-4 may really be better or it may just be that they are understood more because they have been played more.

Andrew Grant: Something that never gets mentioned in these statistical analyses is - how many of these games were played with komi? (And what value of komi?) It should be clear that in the pre-komi era Black would have a better winning percentage regardless of which move he chose in the opening. Unless you can separate the no-komi games from the rest your stats are inevitably going to be misleading.

- DaveSigaty: This is not strictly correct although it is certainly something to keep in mind. In the pre-komi era most games are with the nominally weaker player on Black. This offsets the first move advantage to some extent I expect. Without redoing the whole thing the winning percentage for first move on komoku up through 1939 (1940 seems like a reasonable proxy for the adoption of komi from scanning the games) was 54.6% and since 1940 was 53.3%. The figures are not exactly comparable to those above since they are from a different edition of GoGoD CD.

RafaelCaetano: I find the results and conclusions above quite unconvincing. For instance, Black wins only 47.4% of the games when he plays mokuhazushi (a.k.a "the 3-5 point"). But then, 9.8% of the Black mokuhazushi games are "undecided"! So maybe 47.4% is not so low. If you discard the "undecided" games, then Black wins 52.5% of the games.

By the way, it's misleading to refer to jigo and unknown results as "no result", as this term already has a specific meaning in Japanese rules.